真正高效的SQLSERVER分頁查詢(多種方案)
更新時間:2013年04月01日 17:27:03 作者:
Sqlserver數(shù)據(jù)庫分頁查詢一直是Sqlserver的短板,分頁查詢每頁30條,查詢第1500頁(即第45001-45030條數(shù)據(jù))進行測試,分析出最高效的查詢,感興趣的朋友可以參考下哈
Sqlserver數(shù)據(jù)庫分頁查詢一直是Sqlserver的短板,閑來無事,想出幾種方法,假設(shè)有表ARTICLE,字段ID、YEAR...(其他省略),數(shù)據(jù)53210條(客戶真實數(shù)據(jù),量不大),分頁查詢每頁30條,查詢第1500頁(即第45001-45030條數(shù)據(jù)),字段ID聚集索引,YEAR無索引,Sqlserver版本:2008R2
第一種方案、最簡單、普通的方法:
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM ARTICLE WHERE ID NOT IN(SELECT TOP 45000 ID FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:45s
第二種方案:
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (SELECT TOP 45030 * FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) f ORDER BY f.YEAR ASC, f.ID DESC) s ORDER BY s.YEAR DESC,s.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:138S
第三種方案:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1,
(
SELECT TOP 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT TOP 50030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:21S
第四種方案:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1
WHERE ID in
(
SELECT top 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT top 45030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
)
ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:20S
第五種方案:
SELECT w2.n, w1.* FROM ARTICLE w1, (
SELECT TOP 50030 row_number() OVER (ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) n, ID FROM ARTICLE
) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID AND w2.n > 50000 ORDER BY w2.n ASC
平均查詢100次所需時間:15S
查詢第1000-1030條記錄
第一種方案:
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM ARTICLE WHERE ID NOT IN(SELECT TOP 1000 ID FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:80s
第二種方案:
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (SELECT TOP 1030 * FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) f ORDER BY f.YEAR ASC, f.ID DESC
) s ORDER BY s.YEAR DESC,s.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:30S
第三種方案:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1,
(
SELECT TOP 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT TOP 1030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:12S
第四種方案:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1
WHERE ID in
(
SELECT top 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT top 1030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
)
ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:13S
第五種方案:
SELECT w2.n, w1.* FROM ARTICLE w1,(
SELECT TOP 1030 row_number() OVER (ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) n, ID FROM ARTICLE
) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID AND w2.n > 1000 ORDER BY w2.n ASC
平均查詢100次所需時間:14S
由此可見在查詢頁數(shù)靠前時,效率3>4>5>2>1,頁碼靠后時5>4>3>1>2,再根據(jù)用戶習(xí)慣,一般用戶的檢索只看最前面幾頁,因此選擇3 4 5方案均可,若綜合考慮方案5是最好的選擇,但是要注意SQL2000不支持row_number()函數(shù),由于時間和條件的限制沒有做更深入、范圍更廣的測試,有興趣的可以仔細(xì)研究下。
以下是根據(jù)第四種方案編寫的一個分頁存儲過程:
if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[sys_Page_v2]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsProcedure') = 1)
drop procedure [dbo].[sys_Page_v2]
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[sys_Page_v2]
@PCount int output, --總頁數(shù)輸出
@RCount int output, --總記錄數(shù)輸出
@sys_Table nvarchar(100), --查詢表名
@sys_Key varchar(50), --主鍵
@sys_Fields nvarchar(500), --查詢字段
@sys_Where nvarchar(3000), --查詢條件
@sys_Order nvarchar(100), --排序字段
@sys_Begin int, --開始位置
@sys_PageIndex int, --當(dāng)前頁數(shù)
@sys_PageSize int --頁大小
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
SET ANSI_WARNINGS ON
IF @sys_PageSize < 0 OR @sys_PageIndex < 0
BEGIN
RETURN
END
DECLARE @new_where1 NVARCHAR(3000)
DECLARE @new_order1 NVARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @new_order2 NVARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @Sql NVARCHAR(4000)
DECLARE @SqlCount NVARCHAR(4000)
DECLARE @Top int
if(@sys_Begin <=0)
set @sys_Begin=0
else
set @sys_Begin=@sys_Begin-1
IF ISNULL(@sys_Where,'') = ''
SET @new_where1 = ' '
ELSE
SET @new_where1 = ' WHERE ' + @sys_Where
IF ISNULL(@sys_Order,'') <> ''
BEGIN
SET @new_order1 = ' ORDER BY ' + Replace(@sys_Order,'desc','')
SET @new_order1 = Replace(@new_order1,'asc','desc')
SET @new_order2 = ' ORDER BY ' + @sys_Order
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SET @new_order1 = ' ORDER BY ID DESC'
SET @new_order2 = ' ORDER BY ID ASC'
END
SET @SqlCount = 'SELECT @RCount=COUNT(1),@PCount=CEILING((COUNT(1)+0.0)/'
+ CAST(@sys_PageSize AS NVARCHAR)+') FROM ' + @sys_Table + @new_where1
EXEC SP_EXECUTESQL @SqlCount,N'@RCount INT OUTPUT,@PCount INT OUTPUT',
@RCount OUTPUT,@PCount OUTPUT
IF @sys_PageIndex > CEILING((@RCount+0.0)/@sys_PageSize) --如果輸入的當(dāng)前頁數(shù)大于實際總頁數(shù),則把實際總頁數(shù)賦值給當(dāng)前頁數(shù)
BEGIN
SET @sys_PageIndex = CEILING((@RCount+0.0)/@sys_PageSize)
END
set @sql = 'select '+ @sys_fields +' from ' + @sys_Table + ' w1 '
+ ' where '+ @sys_Key +' in ('
+'select top '+ ltrim(str(@sys_PageSize)) +' ' + @sys_Key + ' from '
+'('
+'select top ' + ltrim(STR(@sys_PageSize * @sys_PageIndex + @sys_Begin)) + ' ' + @sys_Key + ' FROM '
+ @sys_Table + @new_where1 + @new_order2
+') w ' + @new_order1
+') ' + @new_order2
print(@sql)
Exec(@sql)
GO
第一種方案、最簡單、普通的方法:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM ARTICLE WHERE ID NOT IN(SELECT TOP 45000 ID FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:45s
第二種方案:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (SELECT TOP 45030 * FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) f ORDER BY f.YEAR ASC, f.ID DESC) s ORDER BY s.YEAR DESC,s.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:138S
第三種方案:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1,
(
SELECT TOP 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT TOP 50030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:21S
第四種方案:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1
WHERE ID in
(
SELECT top 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT top 45030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
)
ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:20S
第五種方案:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT w2.n, w1.* FROM ARTICLE w1, (
SELECT TOP 50030 row_number() OVER (ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) n, ID FROM ARTICLE
) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID AND w2.n > 50000 ORDER BY w2.n ASC
平均查詢100次所需時間:15S
查詢第1000-1030條記錄
第一種方案:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM ARTICLE WHERE ID NOT IN(SELECT TOP 1000 ID FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:80s
第二種方案:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (SELECT TOP 1030 * FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) f ORDER BY f.YEAR ASC, f.ID DESC
) s ORDER BY s.YEAR DESC,s.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:30S
第三種方案:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1,
(
SELECT TOP 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT TOP 1030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:12S
第四種方案:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1
WHERE ID in
(
SELECT top 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT top 1030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
)
ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC
平均查詢100次所需時間:13S
第五種方案:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
SELECT w2.n, w1.* FROM ARTICLE w1,(
SELECT TOP 1030 row_number() OVER (ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) n, ID FROM ARTICLE
) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID AND w2.n > 1000 ORDER BY w2.n ASC
平均查詢100次所需時間:14S
由此可見在查詢頁數(shù)靠前時,效率3>4>5>2>1,頁碼靠后時5>4>3>1>2,再根據(jù)用戶習(xí)慣,一般用戶的檢索只看最前面幾頁,因此選擇3 4 5方案均可,若綜合考慮方案5是最好的選擇,但是要注意SQL2000不支持row_number()函數(shù),由于時間和條件的限制沒有做更深入、范圍更廣的測試,有興趣的可以仔細(xì)研究下。
以下是根據(jù)第四種方案編寫的一個分頁存儲過程:
復(fù)制代碼 代碼如下:
if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[sys_Page_v2]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsProcedure') = 1)
drop procedure [dbo].[sys_Page_v2]
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[sys_Page_v2]
@PCount int output, --總頁數(shù)輸出
@RCount int output, --總記錄數(shù)輸出
@sys_Table nvarchar(100), --查詢表名
@sys_Key varchar(50), --主鍵
@sys_Fields nvarchar(500), --查詢字段
@sys_Where nvarchar(3000), --查詢條件
@sys_Order nvarchar(100), --排序字段
@sys_Begin int, --開始位置
@sys_PageIndex int, --當(dāng)前頁數(shù)
@sys_PageSize int --頁大小
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
SET ANSI_WARNINGS ON
IF @sys_PageSize < 0 OR @sys_PageIndex < 0
BEGIN
RETURN
END
DECLARE @new_where1 NVARCHAR(3000)
DECLARE @new_order1 NVARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @new_order2 NVARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @Sql NVARCHAR(4000)
DECLARE @SqlCount NVARCHAR(4000)
DECLARE @Top int
if(@sys_Begin <=0)
set @sys_Begin=0
else
set @sys_Begin=@sys_Begin-1
IF ISNULL(@sys_Where,'') = ''
SET @new_where1 = ' '
ELSE
SET @new_where1 = ' WHERE ' + @sys_Where
IF ISNULL(@sys_Order,'') <> ''
BEGIN
SET @new_order1 = ' ORDER BY ' + Replace(@sys_Order,'desc','')
SET @new_order1 = Replace(@new_order1,'asc','desc')
SET @new_order2 = ' ORDER BY ' + @sys_Order
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SET @new_order1 = ' ORDER BY ID DESC'
SET @new_order2 = ' ORDER BY ID ASC'
END
SET @SqlCount = 'SELECT @RCount=COUNT(1),@PCount=CEILING((COUNT(1)+0.0)/'
+ CAST(@sys_PageSize AS NVARCHAR)+') FROM ' + @sys_Table + @new_where1
EXEC SP_EXECUTESQL @SqlCount,N'@RCount INT OUTPUT,@PCount INT OUTPUT',
@RCount OUTPUT,@PCount OUTPUT
IF @sys_PageIndex > CEILING((@RCount+0.0)/@sys_PageSize) --如果輸入的當(dāng)前頁數(shù)大于實際總頁數(shù),則把實際總頁數(shù)賦值給當(dāng)前頁數(shù)
BEGIN
SET @sys_PageIndex = CEILING((@RCount+0.0)/@sys_PageSize)
END
set @sql = 'select '+ @sys_fields +' from ' + @sys_Table + ' w1 '
+ ' where '+ @sys_Key +' in ('
+'select top '+ ltrim(str(@sys_PageSize)) +' ' + @sys_Key + ' from '
+'('
+'select top ' + ltrim(STR(@sys_PageSize * @sys_PageIndex + @sys_Begin)) + ' ' + @sys_Key + ' FROM '
+ @sys_Table + @new_where1 + @new_order2
+') w ' + @new_order1
+') ' + @new_order2
print(@sql)
Exec(@sql)
GO
相關(guān)文章
SQL查詢服務(wù)器下所有數(shù)據(jù)庫及數(shù)據(jù)庫的全部表
這篇文章主要介紹了SQL查詢服務(wù)器下所有數(shù)據(jù)庫,數(shù)據(jù)庫的全部表,本文通過實例代碼給大家介紹的非常詳細(xì),對大家的學(xué)習(xí)或工作具有一定的參考借鑒價值,需要的朋友可以參考下2023-05-05SQL Server中通用數(shù)據(jù)庫角色權(quán)限的處理詳解
這篇文章主要給大家介紹了關(guān)于SQL Server中通用數(shù)據(jù)庫角色權(quán)限處理的相關(guān)資料,文中通過示例代碼介紹的非常詳細(xì),對大家的學(xué)習(xí)或者工作具有一定的參考學(xué)習(xí)價值,需要的朋友們下面隨著小編來一起學(xué)習(xí)學(xué)習(xí)吧2018-10-10CREATE FUNCTION sqlserver用戶定義函數(shù)
創(chuàng)建用戶定義函數(shù),它是返回值的已保存的 Transact-SQL 例程。用戶定義函數(shù)不能用于執(zhí)行一組修改全局?jǐn)?shù)據(jù)庫狀態(tài)的操作。與系統(tǒng)函數(shù)一樣,用戶定義函數(shù)可以從查詢中喚醒調(diào)用。也可以像存儲過程一樣,通過 EXECUTE 語句執(zhí)行2012-07-07深入學(xué)習(xí)SQL Server聚合函數(shù)算法優(yōu)化技巧
這篇文章主要深入學(xué)習(xí)SQL Server聚合函數(shù)算法優(yōu)化技巧,感興趣的小伙伴們可以參考一下2015-12-12SQL?Server基礎(chǔ)教程之游標(biāo)(Cursor)
這篇文章主要給大家介紹了關(guān)于SQL?Server基礎(chǔ)教程之游標(biāo)(Cursor)的相關(guān)資料,游標(biāo)是SQL Server的一種數(shù)據(jù)訪問機制,它允許用戶訪問單獨的數(shù)據(jù)行,需要的朋友可以參考下2023-11-11